Is ex-Deputy Granovsky regaining influence over the judicial system? – mass media

Date:

The Supreme Court did not consider the complaint of the senior detective of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau, Vasyl Senyuta, against the decision of the High Anti-Corruption Court, which suspended him from investigating the case of the former People’s Deputy from the BPP Oleksandr Granovskyi.

Such a decision was made by the Criminal Court of Cassation on February 2, reports Slovo i Dilo.

As is known, the investigative judge VAKS removed the senior detective of NABU Senyuta from the investigation of the case of ex-Deputy Granovsky regarding the losses of the state PJSC “Odesa Port Plant”. The NABU detective tried to appeal this decision in the Appeals Chamber of the State Security Service of Ukraine and the Criminal Court of Cassation. However, both courts refused to consider the complaints, as the said decision of the investigating judge is not subject to appeal.

“Refuse to open cassation proceedings based on the cassation appeal of the senior detective of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, Vasyl Senyuta, against the decision of the Appellate Chamber of the Higher Anti-Corruption Court dated November 1, 2022, on the refusal to open appeal proceedings”the decision states.

We will remind NABU and SAP reported the suspicion to four persons in causing 93.3 million UAH of damage to OPZ. Among the suspects is Oleksandr Granovskyi, a former assistant to People’s Deputy from the “Block of Petro Poroshenko” faction, and a former member of the board of OPZ Olha Tkachenko. She was declared wanted, as was the owner of Newscope Estates Limited, Pavlo Chumak. October 21, 2022 NABU and SAP ex-Deputy Granovskyi was also informed about the suspicionbut in absentia.

The investigation established that ex-Deputy Granovsky, through his assistant Tkachenko, organized a scheme under which OPZ sold mineral fertilizers to a predetermined company, Newscope Estates Limited, at prices lower than market prices. Later, this company resold the goods to foreign companies from the real sector of the economy at competitive prices. However, OPZ provided physical supply to these companies.

The scheme operated during March-December 2015. OPZ officials were involved in its implementation. As a result of such illegal actions, the OPZ did not receive an income of about UAH 93.3 million.

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related