The security service systematically exposes supporters of racism, who help the aggressor to implement Russian “education” programs in the occupied regions of the south and east of Ukraine.
Since the beginning of 2023, more than 30 teachers have been notified of suspicion of voluntary cooperation with the enemy.
Among them are the heads of the “education departments” created by the Russian occupiers, as well as directors of captured Ukrainian schools and lyceums.
In the course of stabilization measures in liberated Kherson, the headmistresses of two secondary schools were exposed, who destroyed Ukrainian textbooks and imposed the Kremlin’s vision of the history of our state.
They also forced teachers to conduct classes in Russian according to the programs of the aggressor country.
In case of refusal, they threatened to “report” to the occupation authorities and threatened with persecution by the Rashists.
And in the temporarily occupied Severodonetsk, the head of the local “education department” of the LNR terrorist organization was identified.
Since the beginning of September last year, she actively “restored” the work of educational institutions for the benefit of the Russian Federation.
To do this, she called on local teachers to support the Russian invaders and get jobs as teachers in schools controlled by them.
In the case of agreement, she promised the loyal attitude of the occupiers and “salary” in Russian rubles.
In addition, the head of the “district administration of education of the Novopskovsky district of the LPR” was exposed, who periodically organizes trips for teachers to “reformatting courses” to the Russian city of Voronezh.
Currently, these and other persons involved have been notified of suspicion under two articles of the Criminal Code of Ukraine:
- Art. 111-1 (collaborative activity);
- Art. 111-2 (assistance to the aggressor state).
Comprehensive measures are underway to bring the culprits to justice.
The investigation was conducted by SBU employees of the Kherson, Donetsk, and Luhansk regions under the procedural guidance of the prosecutor’s office.
According to SBU materials
